Applying the Principles of Aikido to Combat Terrorismby Steve Kanney

a class=”addthis_button_google_plusone” g:plusone:size=”small”>

First let us look at the enemy, so to speak. I heard of a story on a Muslim talk show where a 3 year old child was interviewed. The subject was how the child felt about Jews. While you might expect the interviewer to be objective and the child fairly normal, instead the child was clearly brainwashed and the interviewer helped complete the child’s thoughts in the malevolent form expected by the audience. What was truly remarkable was the mundane manner in which a 3 year old child spouted off hateful comments towards the Jews as if self evidently true. In some ways it was reminiscent of the trial of Eichmann, the Nazi torturer who sat calmly by as witnesses testified to his atrocities. When asked if it was true, he remarked in a matter of fact manner that he was just following orders. In fact, after the Holocaust, social scientists engaged in substantial research finding that the majority of average people would harm or even risk accidentally killing innocent people if they were ordered to do so by an authority figure. They did not lose their sense of ethics, but suspended it in favor of a perceived authority figure.

With this underpinning, mischievous individuals within the Islam whose view of the world is distorted  manipulate people to create a narrow view or oversimplification of their conflict with the west by echoing historical conflicts such as the Crusades. These individuals propagate anger which is based upon a distortion of reality. Then when their distortion of reality takes on a life of its own, suddenly it generates more anger. This situation is disastrous. When we look at the broad population of people willing to hate and kill Americans from the Muslim world, we look at their “training” and the traditions of hatred spanning centuries, solving the problem is clearly daunting.

As the source of the problem, we can look to the poverty and exploitation of the Arab world. Certain jealousies are developed and hatred directed to us, as we do have the responsibility for exploitation to acquire oil and have benefitted economically. Further, a certain rigidity in thinking about religion is an additional factor. Perhaps the view that there can only be one Allah, and the existence of a multi-religious society such as America is a threat to this view. This factor really highlights a lack of education on their own religion, as Islam itself is more open to people of other faiths and abhors violence. Ultimately, these factors are combined with enormous hatred, strong willpower and determination leading to suicide bombing.

The problem is clearly long term in nature. So adopting a short term solution will not address the underlying cause. Short term solutions are very important – we need to patrol our borders and try to stop terrorist acts in any manner we can. But without addressing the underlying long run causes, for every Osama bin Laden we kill, we can expect 3 more to pop up.

The long term solution needs to address the education, poverty and oppression of the Arab people. Rather than separating them from us, we need to look at all of humanity as one family. We need to view the world in pluralistic form and help each group to find the peace and happiness we all seek in our lives. Different approaches will certainly apply to different populations, but we all aspire to the same goals. In the Arab world, the common man on the street has been unjustly treated by their governments in many cases. In our relentless drive to acquire material possessions, we traded oil for the well being of our Arab brothers and sisters. Many of these governments were replaced by other oppressive forms, but the man on the street still blames us to some degree. We need to take personal responsibility to improve the lives of these people, both individually and through our government.

We also need to work towards improving their education. While education may include technical knowledge which will enable them to elevate their lifestyle through better jobs, education of the heart is also included. Fortunately many Arabs already have a natural affinity for the Muslim faith, which when properly practiced includes ethics, compassion, nonviolent responses to problems, alleviates hatred and promotes peace.

When we consider a large swath of the Arab population as having a distorted and oversimplified view, we might consider that such a long term plan would not work. Many “Soviet citizens” still march to their death in support of Lenin and hating the west. In fact, people who have been brainwashed may never inspect the assumptions underlying their “training.” That said, if we educate the young and as many of the elderly as will accept new information, and then we take away the reasons the Arab world may hate the west by working to eliminate their poverty and oppression, long run results will clearly be improved. We will cut off the new supply of potential suicide bombers, and the current batch is limited. Over time our risk of attack will decline and eventually come to an end.

While it may be difficult to embark of such a program of education and improvement in social conditions in the Arab world, we need to consider the alternative should we wish to end terrorism. The short answer is we really don’t have any. The short term patchwork of preventing attacks cannot work on its own as more suicide bombers are born every day. The Arabs in question suffer from a distorted view of the source of their own misery which is used to promote anger. Only by communicating with them on the level of their perceived misery, that is ending their poverty and oppression, can we challenge at least their determination if not the underlying view itself. Educating the mind to become more open, flexible and ethical further undermines their view. We must prioritize the needs of these people above our own relentless pursuit of material gain or suffer continued risk of violent attacks.

Another question that may arise from this discussion is whether hatred is learned or taught. The answer is actually both. A mind in a peaceful state does not move. There is no greed or hatred. On a fundamental level we can think of the notion we have of ourselves, which is inherent at birth. Greed represents pulling towards oneself things we believe will make us happy. Hatred represents pushing away the opposite. An infant definitely has both. As we learn more about our world we may experiment and find that relinquishing both the pushing and pulling allows a greater sense of peace to emerge. With sufficient quiet on our part, we may inspect our underlying assumptions about who we are and whether the objects we believe will cause happiness or misery actually do what we think. We may enter a world without distortion. Even someone who is brainwashed (i.e. taught to hate) can get tired of the lack of peace and happiness found from hatred and experiment to find greater peace. Eliminating these irrational emotions will result in a more peaceful and happier existence in every human being who ventures into this experiment.

So while we may fear that learned hatred can never be reversed or that hatred is inherent to our existence, we all have the tools to eliminate hatred and find a greater sense of peace within ourselves. The simple fact that all paths to happiness lead away from hatred can inspire some confidence in us that a long term plan such as this can work. By removing the superficial source of hatred through education and improved economic/social environment, even those brainwashed may find themselves freer to inspect whether their “training” leads to happiness or misery. Suicide bombing is quite an extreme event. We do have sociological studies that suggest the majority of people are willing to risk killing someone else if ordered by an authority figure and no penalty is present. How many would be willing to kill themselves when they have a comfortable life and exist in a more pluralistic/educated culture? People born into a culture of hatred spanning centuries can learn and the cycle can end, but it won’t happen overnight.

 

Summary
Article Name
Aikido and Terrorism
Author

by

Tags:

Comments

15 responses to “Applying the Principles of Aikido to Combat Terrorismby Steve Kanney”

  1. Gregroy Avatar
    Gregroy

    Islamic terrorism is perhaps the most important problem on mankind’s plate. Addressing it from various angles is a great brainstorming exercise, which may not necessarily lead to a solution, yet helps to hone one’s ethics and standpoint on the matter. Therefore, while not disagreeing with most of the above article, I am setting out as the devil’s advocate. As a person who spent several years working in Arab countries and wrote a book on their history, ways and culture, I am challenging several stipulations and strategies suggested by the author.

    Stipulation:
    “the Arab world”
    Comment:
    Radical Muslim terrorism has by far outgrown the Arab world. About 20% of the world population practice Islam, their numbers rapidly growing in Africa, Asia, Europe and North America. According to the U.S. Religion Census, Islam is the fastest growing religion in America in the last 10 years, with 2.6 million living in the U.S. today, up from 1 million in 2000.

    Stipulation:
    “As the source of the problem, we can look to the poverty and exploitation of the Arab world”.
    “We do have the responsibility for exploitation to acquire oil and have benefitted economically”.

    Comment:
    Acquiring oil and benefiting economically is not a sin or crime to be ashamed of. It is the very nature of capitalism and free economy to buy things at a bargain price and turn them through added value into profit. Note the word “buy”. Oil has not been stolen from oil-producing countries. It was not even taken for reparations. It was and is paid for at market rates. The way the revenue is utilized by the sellers is the matter of their internal political and social set-up. In some oil-producing countries the wealth is largely appropriated by corrupt (albeit legal) rulers. In other countries, due to the “petroleum curse”, a very comfortable living standard has been built for the native population, like Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. For example, Kuwait has an 83.5% literacy rate due to extensive government support for the education system. Public school education, including Kuwait University, is free for Kuwait citizens. Even Libya until recently, had one of the highest living standards in Africa. Libyan citizens were entitled to free health care, education, housing and minimal wage. Note, though, that only full-fledged citizens enjoy the benefits; Arab workers from other countries are entitled to nothing and exploited by their brethren to the maximum.
    How would we quit “ benefiting economically” from them? By stopping buying their oil? It may be happening soon, with active search for alternative energies and more drilling in our own territory. However, once it happened, would not that enhance more poverty in the other part of the world and ignite more hatred?

    Stipulation:
    “Perhaps the view that there can only be one Allah, and the existence of a multi-religious society such as America is a threat to this view”. “Islam itself is more open to people of other faiths and abhors violence”.
    Comment:
    Indeed, the Quran defines the adepts of two other monotheistic religions – Judaism and Christianity – as “Ahl al-Kitāb” – “people of the Book”, who went astray and are not beyond salvation if governed by Muslim law called Sharia. All other faiths are inadvertently infidel. For Muslims, the failure of Allah’s creation to submit to the system He has prescribed is a blasphemy that cannot stand.
    As for abhorring violence, Islam has many instructions to choose from, depending whether one wants to go peaceful or aggressive. An often quoted verse of the Quran is from chapter 9, verse 5:
    فإذا انسلخ الأشهر الحرم فاقتلوا المشركين حيث وجدتموهم“When the four forbidden months are over, then wherever you encounter the idolaters, kill them!”

    Stipulation:
    The majority of average people would harm or even risk accidentally killing innocent people if they were ordered to do so by an authority figure.
    Comment:
    This is true. Too bad, all armies in the world depend on unquestionable obedience of orders along the chain of command. Any other way would render an army inoperable. In civil life, that principle does not apply. However, most militant religious zealots consider themselves “warriors” and embrace unquestioning obedience at any cost to their own life or lives of others.

    Stipulation:
    “The long term solution needs to address the education, poverty and oppression of the Arab people”.
    “ if we educate the young and as many of the elderly as will accept new information, and then we take away the reasons the Arab world may hate the west by working to eliminate their poverty and oppression, long run results will clearly be improved”

    Comment:
    Most of the people we would so much like to educate, do not want our instructions. Moreover, they are anxious to re-educate us. The main difference between us is that the Western society does not have an agenda, while they do. We are increasingly individualistic, preaching peace, comfort, material wealth and tolerance (easily and often translated as “indifference”). They value their faith beyond any particular country, and strive for building a Global Islamic Caliphate ruled by Sharia Law. Islam anticipates global hegemony and with utmost sincerity considers it inevitable. Of course, not all the Muslims are eager to impose their ways on the rest of the world. However, it takes only 10% of a country’s population to unite around an agenda, to bring forth a revolution.

    Aikido Approach to the problem:
    One of the core Aikido strategies is taking and withholding the center. The one who controls the center line controls the opponent.
    The center core of any social movement is its leadership. Most of them, including Muslim leaders, are life-long politicians with all weaknesses and skeletons that pile up in any politician’s closet over years. By definitions, a politician must be somewhat flexible and prone to compromise. There are many ways to control politicians, which is beyond the scope of this discussion. The point is that we need our politicians train better to be better masters gaining the center line, and through the control of One Point guide the opponent lovingly and firmly to a least violent conflict resolution.

    1. kim Avatar
      kim

      good points, gregory.

  2. admin Avatar
    admin

    I’m going to have to reply to these ne at a time: “the Arab world”

    Reply – Good point. Thank you

  3. admin Avatar
    admin

    “As the source of the problem, we can look to the poverty and exploitation of the Arab world”.
    “We do have the responsibility for exploitation to acquire oil and have benefitted economically”.

    Reply – Economists themselves recognize problems with the free market system of buying low and selling high indiscriminantly. Take global warming: you produce dirty energy cheap and force governments to pay for the clean up. You make money and the society in which you live suffers.

    So when you engage in economic activity you need to do so from a broader perspective and look at the long term consequences for all stake holders. In Iran/Iraq I suspect the people did not participate in the economic benefits, but high government officials did quite well. If you purchase from that sort of buyer you are harming people, so you may consider paying a higher price and advertising the ethical reason for your decision. You have lower profits, but if everyone does this those countries may have been forced to help their populations more. Long run a system like this is sustainable. I am not sure if the Daily Life blog got into this point yet, but if it did not, it will.

    Also, if a country takes its oil revenues and gives the people free health care, that is a start. But they need to recognize that they are making a living just by selling a limited supply of a comodity. They need to prepare their people to perform work that adds value and can provide a living for everyone long run. These considerations should also weigh in the decision on where to purchase oil.

    So the free market system is good, but if the decision makers operate on pure unadulterated greed without consideration of the impact of their decisions, the long run will actually minimize their income. People up top need to get smarter about how they conduct themselves.

  4. admin Avatar
    admin

    “Perhaps the view that there can only be one Allah, and the existence of a multi-religious society such as America is a threat to this view”. “Islam itself is more open to people of other faiths and abhors violence”.

    Reply – here we confront the notion of fundamentalism. Is the Koran to be taken literally, or does it teach a state of mind which produces happiness for oneself and everyone else around you? If it is the former, everyone on earth is in a greatt deal of trouble. To be certain we are interpreting the words of the Koran properly, a simple test is whether it is based upon kindness and compassion. If the impact of a decision based upon the Koran makes others happy and better off, it is good. If it harms other then one should reinterpret the Koran in a more constructive manner. I am suggesting the broad population of Muslims begin to view their religious education through this more constructive lens.

  5. admin Avatar
    admin

    “The long term solution needs to address the education, poverty and oppression of the Arab people”.
    “ if we educate the young and as many of the elderly as will accept new information, and then we take away the reasons the Arab world may hate the west by working to eliminate their poverty and oppression, long run results will clearly be improved”

    Reply – in this and the previous you are describing extremists who are dedicated single mindedly to their destructive cause. It is true they do not want our education. They also do not want our economic aid. I am not an expert on how to execute the strategy, but we need to engage with them properly and respectful of their culture. We can actually influence a lot through our decisions to purchase products. This engagement would not go through intergovernmental channels, but our business leaders can help to create a more constructive society in Muslim countries through this channel. Same goes for consumers. Then to the extent the government takes a genuine caring role while allowing for Islamic culture, then conditions on the streets can improve. Finally, there are many great practitioners of Islam working to influence these destructive people to change their ways. Finding out where these efforts are underway and supporting them could be instrumental. Again, I do not have access to the details, but this can be a point of focus.

  6. admin Avatar
    admin

    Aikido approach

    Reply – I suspect Mohatma Ghandi did not have so many skeletons in his closet, but Obama and Romney both have more than their fair share. If our leadership does not behave properly, both business and political, then we are in a lot of trouble. Right now, we are in a lot of trouble. It is disturbing to me in watching the recent debates to see Obama and Romney not fighting over substantive issues, but instead fight over sound bites. They know voters only listen for a millisecond to see what anyone has to say, so if they can just label the other person with a two word negative sound bite, everyone will vote for them. There is simply no discussion of our situation and what we need to do. Right now the President’s office is still the most powerful office in the world, and we (the broad population of America) execute our authority to place a person in that job with a split second of thought. If we don’t fix ourselves, we don’t stand much chance of fixing anyone else. We need to do better…

    Thanks for your comments. I think it is very helpful.

  7. Ric Avatar
    Ric

    Thank u. Gregory. I agree with everything u wrote very well done. Its true one point with regards to Aikido about the center it is like that for every martial arts. Control the center control the opponent. One other thing too. Why is when we try to do right by other nations ( sending food, supply, etc) we still are hated. My feelings are these everyone in the world is important no one is no better nor are they any less. Yet here we have social classes yet u don’t see people trying kill those better off then they are . Hatred is learned.

    1. admin Avatar
      admin

      People don’t like being dependent upon others for food. If I put you in a position where you can’t eat, and then condescend to give you food out of the “goodness of my heart,” you might be angry at me as well. If I teach you how to fish instead of giving you fish simply because I want you to do well on your own, maybe you wouldn’t be so mad.

      Yes, hatred is learned. But if fire burns your skin, you will pull back with a strong sense of dislike. Infants do this as well even before taught to do so. This aversion is the root of hatred. Without it hatred cannot exist. I can speak for myself…I was born with this.

  8. Ric Avatar
    Ric

    Sorry for the incomplete comment. Iam doing this from my phone. Like it was said before in Gregory’s comment, we paid for oil what those government did with what they received is on them. When we were attacked we did not attack the whole muslim community instead we only held those responsible for the attack. Most people always look to blame someone else or find a cause to use for an excuse instead of taking ownership for their own doing.

  9. Ric Avatar
    Ric

    That’s it for this topic. Too much politics behind it.

  10. admin Avatar
    admin

    The question here is not one of politics. It is a question of the basic definition of right and wrong. You buy oil from somone and they harm their own people. You did not take a harmful action towards anyone and therefore you did nothing wrong. This is one view of ethics.

    Here is another view – you had the capacity to do something helpful for someone else and you did not act upon it because it was inconvenient for you. That is just as bad as doing something harmful.

    Consider you are standing next to someone who is about to shoot a child with a gun. You could stop it at no risk to yourself and you just let them go ahead and shoot anyway. You will not be tried and convicted of murder in a court of law, but are you still guilty of murder? Forget the politics of the middle east for the moment and look at this ethical question. What do you think?

    1. Ric Avatar
      Ric

      right and wrong , right we have the ability to choose where we get our oil from and even with that , even if we get from some place that dose right by thier people when scaled down the line some person or persons will get shafted thats wrong, but i should be blamed my intentions may always be right but by the time it gets to end it will inherit some wrong.

      like stories being passed down by one person to another they all start with the same words yet pick up a few different version by the time its being told by the 3rd person.

      if someone pushes you once , twice, by the third time you will push back with what ever means you have readily available to you.

      1. Ric Avatar
        Ric

        some people have ethics and others dont you are still not responsible for everyone.

  11. admin Avatar
    admin

    let’s do this step by step. forget terrorism. I see someone about to take a live wire and electrocute a child. I am standing next to the power switch to the building and all I need to do is turn it off and they cannot harm the child. I don’t turn it off because of the following. What am I guilty of if anything?

    a) i know the child’s parents and want to see them suffer by having their child murdered.

    b) it’s too much effort to bend over to turn the switch.

    c) i don’t know what the switch is for but would do anything to save the child’s life.

    After establishing basic ethics we can start to clarify things.

Leave a Reply